Gay friendly bible

The Bible and same sex relationships: A review article

Tim Keller, 2015

Vines, Matthew, God and the Gay Christian: The Biblical Case in Support of Same Sex Relationships, Convergent Books, 2014

Wilson, Ken,A Letter to My Congregation, David Crum Media, 2014.

The relationship of homosexuality to Christianity is one of the main topics of discussion in our culture today. In the fall of last year I wrote a review of books by Wesley Hill and Sam Allberry that take the historic Christian view, in Hill’s words: “that homosexuality was not God’s original imaginative intention for humanity ... and therefore that gay practice goes against God’s express will for all human beings, especially those who trust in Christ.”

There are a number of other books that take the opposite view, namely that the Bible either allows for or supports same sex relationships. Over the last year or so I (and other pastors at Redeemer) have been regularly asked for responses to their arguments. The two most read volumes taking this position seem to be those by Matthew Vines and Ken Wilson. The review of these two books will be longer than usual because the topic is so contested today and, wh

Jeremiah KaayaSupporterPastor at Springs of Power Church, Teacher by professionalHow we package homosexuality can never produce it acceptable. It is an abomination like one sleeping with their parents, sleeping with beasts, and if we have accepted none of these, neither will we allow gay. Mark you, it is not us to disapprove or accept, the standard has already been set by God, gay is not only a sin, it is an abomination. Whatever we are discussing here or there is our business, not God's. On that note therefore, I can't join a gay affirming "church" because to be gay is already non-Christian, for that reason I would be attending something else not a Christian Church, at least not one Jesus the CHRIST died for. I thank God for His Son Jesus the CHRIST, had it not been Him, at the right hand of God the Father, pleading for us day and night, in the hope that we will transform, this world would include already suffered the fate of of Sodom and Gomorrah. Jesus stands between us and God the Father, otherwise, His wrath would have already finished us. Let us stop bragging about sin, more so abominations like same-sex attracted, because if we don't, soon people will begin to demand to freely practice inc

Channel72 wrote: Are you even trying any more?

You for sure aren't. Your bewildered rambling that isn't dealing with my point is dull. Fact is, Profession shows wealth as a reward for faith. Deal with it.

Sigh... now I see you've resorted to outright lying/distortion. You blatantly ignored and then clipped out the part which clearly states my position: [SNIP]
It's not rocket-science, asshole. The extent to which Jesus endorses the Antique Testament isn't transparent, but it IS clear that he wouldn't approve of homosexual sex.

So you admit that when you said that Jesus pretty much endorsed everything in the Old Testamentyou were being packed of hot air? I don't contain to say that this "clarification" of yours only came up after some prodding, right? Does that mean you retract your first post on this thread? I expect so.
As for that "clarification", Jesus was being much harsher on adultery than the OT and forbade divorce outright when the OT allowed it. So once again, it's Jesus quite explicitly not following the OT tradition and yet you somehow use this as proof that Jesus would agree with it on homosexuality nonetheless. That, my son, is called an utter non-sequitur. I was entity kind by ig

What is the Queen James Bible?

Answer

The Queen James Bible (QJV), also called the “Gay Bible,” is an edit of the biblical text done in the identify of preventing “homophobic interpretations.” To accomplish this goal, the publishers printed a Bible in which all negative references to homosexualityhave been removed. The Queen James Bible was published in 2012 and is based on the 1769 edition of the King James Bible.

The publishers of the Queen James Bible chose the name “Queen James” as an obvious take-off on the “King James” Version, as the Authorized Version of 1611 is commonly called. The publishers of the Gay Bible also claim that King James was bisexual, so their choice of title capitalizes on the slang meaning of the term queen.

The editors of the Queen James Bible, who chose to be anonymous, claim that there was no reference to homosexuality in any Bible translation prior to the 1946 Revised Standard Version. Then, they assert, “anti-LGBT Bible interpretations” arose, based on a faulty translation in the RSV of eight verses.

The unidentified “scholars”—their scholastic credentials are unknown—who produced the Queen James Bible suggest that all Bible trans